Asian High Yields – Where do we go from here?

As investors reassess their risk expectations towards the Chinese property sector and the Asian High Yield bond market, we believe that opportunities exist for the discerning investor. While we remain selective in the near term, we note that the incentive for China’s property sector to deleverage has never been stronger, paving the way for better fundamentals over the longer term.

In the recent weeks and months, uncertainty over property developer Evergrande’s ability to meet its interest and coupon payments had sent ripples across Asia’s bond market, and in particular the Asian High Yield bond market.

This is hardly surprising since China accounts for 50% of Asia’s High Yield bond market, with the Chinese property sector making up a significant share. In the near term, the developments surrounding Evergrande are likely to weigh on investor sentiment towards the sector.

The Asian High Yield bond market is no stranger to volatility, yet, the market has been able to deliver positive returns to investors over the long term. See Fig. 1. That said, the Evergrande episode presents longer term ramifications and lessons for investors.

Fig. 1. Positive long term returns despite volatility

asian-high-yields-where-do-we-go-from-here-fig-1

Thanks for subscribing!

Follow us :

Reassessing risk expectations

Investors are likely to reassess their risk expectations towards the Chinese High Yield property bond sector. This would probably result in higher bond yields and wider spreads. Single B-rated issuers and companies with a weaker liquidity profile will find it increasingly challenging to access funding, since the Chinese government’s policy measures to rein in leverage in the property sector are likely to stay.

In recent months, the Chinese authorities had weighed in on mortgage approvals and borrowing rates for first time home buyers, tempered the pace of rental growth in the cities and lowered the premiums developers paid for land. In the first half of 2021, the more stringent mortgage policies slowed cash collections at the property companies, while housing price caps and elevated land costs caused gross EBITDA and margins to trend lower. Meanwhile, although some companies made progress in meeting the government’s “Three Red Lines” policy by June this year, investors need to ensure that improvements in the debt ratios did not come at the expense of higher commercial acceptance bills and minority interests.

This reassessment of risk expectations in the China property sector will instil greater discipline among investors, and companies. Investors will need to be more discerning while the aggressive “high growth-high leverage” business model pursued by many property developers may gradually become a thing of the past. The latter would be in line with the Chinese government’s goal – to bring down leverage in the property sector, increase housing affordability and to direct resources to other strategically important sectors such as advanced manufacturing, technology and renewable energy.

A healthy property sector desirable

While China’s property sector has historically been subject to episodes of policy-driven volatility, it remains an important driver of the Chinese economy for now. It accounts for 27.3% of the country’s Fixed Asset Investment in 2020 and is a key revenue source for many local governments. The Chinese government would therefore prefer to have a healthy property sector than to see multiple large-scale defaults, which could potentially trigger widespread systemic risks.

Chinese property developers had enjoyed positive revenue growth in the first half of 2021 and the contracted sales performance in the first eight months of the year has also been decent. Encouragingly, property inventory (link to Chart of Month article) levels are also much more reasonable. Many developers had slowed down land bank acquisitions in the first half of the year which have helped to conserve cash as liquidity conditions tightened. While debt/EBITDA ratios may have deteriorated marginally in the first half of this year on the back of lower profit margins, net debt/equity and debt/capital ratios were generally stable if not slightly lower compared to end 2020’s levels.

Over the longer term, China’s growing middle class, urbanisation and the development of China’s megacities are likely to continue to support the revenues of the property sector. China’s deleveraging exercise will also ultimately instil stronger market discipline and improve credit fundamentals across the sector.

Opportunities for the discerning

Although investors may expect higher default rates in the Asian High Yield bond market going forward, we believe that opportunities exist for the discerning investor. In China’s High Yield bond market, the percentage of bonds trading below fifty cents to the dollar has risen sharply in recent months. See Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Investors are already pricing in higher default rates

asian-high-yields-where-do-we-go-from-here-fig-1

While we remain selective in our portfolio positioning in the near term, we note that the incentive for the Chinese property companies to deleverage has never been stronger. As the sector’s fundamentals gradually improve, patient, active investors who do their credit homework are likely to be adequately compensated for their risks.

This document is produced by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited and issued in:

Singapore by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H)

Australia (for wholesale clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore, is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Australian laws

Hong Kong by Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.

Indonesia by PT Eastspring Investments Indonesia, an investment manager that is licensed, registered and supervised by the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK).

Malaysia by Eastspring Investments Berhad (200001028634/ 531241-U) and Eastspring Al-Wara’ Investments Berhad (200901017585 / 860682-K).

Thailand by Eastspring Asset Management (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

United States of America (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is registered with the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser.

European Economic Area (for professional clients only) and Switzerland (for qualified investors only) by Eastspring Investments (Luxembourg) S.A., 26, Boulevard Royal, 2449 Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, registered with the Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés (Luxembourg), Register No B 173737.

Chile (for institutional clients only) by Eastspring Investments (Singapore) Limited (UEN: 199407631H), which is incorporated in Singapore and is licensed and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singapore laws which differ from Chilean laws.

The afore-mentioned entities are hereinafter collectively referred to as Eastspring Investments.

The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Eastspring Investments’ communications. This document is solely for information purposes and does not have any regard to the specific investment objective, financial situation and/or particular needs of any specific persons who may receive this document. This document is not intended as an offer, a solicitation of offer or a recommendation, to deal in shares of securities or any financial instruments. It may not be published, circulated, reproduced or distributed without the prior written consent of Eastspring Investments. Reliance upon information in this document is at the sole discretion of the reader. Please carefully study the related information and/or consult your own professional adviser before investing.

Investment involves risks. Past performance of and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the funds managed by Eastspring Investments.

Information herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Eastspring Investments has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Where lawfully permitted, Eastspring Investments does not warrant its completeness or accuracy and is not responsible for error of facts or opinion nor shall be liable for damages arising out of any person’s reliance upon this information. Any opinion or estimate contained in this document may subject to change without notice.

Eastspring Investments companies (excluding joint venture companies) are ultimately wholly owned/indirect subsidiaries of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including joint venture companies) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America or with the Prudential Assurance Company Limited, a subsidiary of M&G plc (a company incorporated in the United Kingdom).